Sunday, April 29, 2012

What's in a name?

This one is one of my favorite Richard Feynman anecdotes. [Quoted from http://www.vigyanprasar.gov.in/scientists/RichardPFeynman/RichardPFeynman.htm]

Feynman's father Melville Feynman encouraged his son's fascination with science in all possible ways. While not pushing in any particular direction his father would explain things about the way the world worked. Melville taught his son at a very early age 'the difference between knowing the name of something and knowing something'. To quote one of Richard's oft-quoted anecdotes about his father: "See that bird?" he says. "It's a Spencer's warbler (I knew he didn't know the real name)". "Well, in Italian, it's a Chutto Lapittida. In Portuguese, it's a Bom da Peida. In Chinese it's a Chung-Iong-tah, and in Japanese it's a Katano Takeda. You can know the name of the bird in all the languages of the world, but when you're finished, you'll know absolutely nothing whatever about the bird. You'll only know about humans in different places, and what they call the bird. So let's look at the birds and see what it's doing - that's what counts!" 

I've seen so many people - when they realize they haven't understood something correctly - trying to push their way through arguments and discussions using some high-sounding technical jargon. That's what we can call the Spencer's-warbler-syndrome. When reason fails, vocabulary takes over! My only suggestion, admit your mistake and move on.


3 comments:

  1. ... and also, "The general principle is that things which are moving tend to keep on moving, and things which are standing still tend to stand still, unless you push them hard. This tendency is called 'inertia', but nobody knows why it's true."

    ReplyDelete
  2. @ Pranav Gupta: Thanks for reading!

    @ op741: You are talking specifically about Newton's Laws of motion. Actually, no one knows the 'why' of ANY of nature's laws. We only know the 'how' and 'what'...

    ReplyDelete